Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of App Store applications (Science)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 00:11, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

List of App Store applications (Science)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This is a completely subjective list of mostly or entirely non-notable apps for the iPhone. There are countless applications, and simply listing a handful you think might relate to science in some way isn't encyclopedic. --  At am a  頭 23:15, 25 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  --  At am a  頭  23:47, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete WP:NOTCATALOG. --Cyber cobra (talk) 00:37, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - This falls under WP:INDISCRIMINATE - Ahunt (talk) 02:05, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - I see no value here. There is no indication of notability, no useful content, and no apparent selection criteria. &mdash;Roguelazer (talk) 02:30, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as prodder. Wikipedia is neither a price list nor a catalog. I found this as I was checking out the deletion discussion for its redirect List of App Store applications - do I see a speedy deletion of dependent page coming? B.Wind (talk) 04:14, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete - I don't see how this is particularly encyclopaedic but I'm not that bothered either way. -- Eraserhead1 &lt;talk&gt; 10:09, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Why does there need to be an article on Science Apps, most of which are about as notable as a news story about someone going to the shops to buy milk? PerthMod (talk) 10:59, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - the redirect discussion is here -- Eraserhead1 &lt;talk&gt; 11:05, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
 * WP:SNOW delete per above. Pcap ping  17:52, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.