Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Artists and Groups who have won the Grammy Award for Album of the Year more than once as the main credited artist


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Grammy Award for Album of the Year. Everything relevant seems to already be merged, so I will redirect it after letting the close script do all the tagging Courcelles (talk) 19:56, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

List of Artists and Groups who have won the Grammy Award for Album of the Year more than once as the main credited artist

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article is essentially just a subset of winners listed in the article Grammy Award for Album of the Year, grouped by artist. This club is likely not notable enough on its own to warrant an article and instead could be mentioned in a single paragraph on the Grammy Award for Album of the Year article, rather than having a separate article that essentially repeats all the info. Also, the use of album covers in the table likely violates WP:NONFREE. Y2Kcrazyjoker4 (talk &bull; contributions) 14:46, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
 * KEEP Y2Kcrazyjoker4 said "likely not notable enough on its own to warrant an article" that's ridiculous in my opinion. Eric Cable  |  Talk  16:40, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Can you provide a more useful justification for keeping the article beyond "that's ridiculous"? If we have an article like this, why not have one called "List of artists who have won the Grammy Award for Record of the Year Award in consecutive years for songs from the same album"? It just does not warrant its own article. Y2Kcrazyjoker4 (talk &bull; contributions) 18:16, 25 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete The topic can easily be covered within already existing articles such as Grammy Award for Album of the Year especially as there are only five entries so does not meet criteria for a separate stand-alone list. Use of album covers clearly violates non free policy. Cowlibob (talk) 17:10, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete needless content fork.  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 19:13, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CONTENTFORK. The info does not merit a separate article. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 19:36, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as unnecessary listcruft. This as stated above can be covered in an already existing article. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:45, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Go ahead and delete it. I don't care anymore. I just get disappointed with stuff like this. I spend time creating content and then someone wipes their backside on it. Eric Cable  |  Talk  20:54, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per reasons already stated above. -Xcuref1endx (talk) 20:56, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note that the article creator is now indef'd and it appears to be snowing here too.  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 08:42, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
 * No longer indeffed but the snow is still likely. No vote here but wouldn't support that the content could be covered elsewhere be better a merge than a delete? -- Ricky81682 (talk) 21:57, 26 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as a needless content fork; can easily be covered at Grammy Award for Album of the Year. Snuggums (talk / edits) 15:55, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge to Grammy Award for Album of the Year. I appreciate Eric's effort to create the list yet it is WP:CFORK and can be easily merged to said list. --  Frankie talk 08:21, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge, unnecessary creation. — I B  [ Poke  ] 10:03, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Have added sentences covering this article topic in the Grammy Award for Album of the Year.[] Cowlibob (talk) 13:16, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge - content fork. -Zanhe (talk) 07:51, 29 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.