Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Australia Test cricket records against Bangladesh


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 01:01, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

List of Australia Test cricket records against Bangladesh

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Overly specific lists of statistics as per WP:NOTSTATS. List of Australia Test cricket records is as specific as it needs to be. Spike &#39;em (talk) 11:30, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages which all suffer from the same issue:
 * I was wondering where the England article was, but it is already deleted. As per that discussion, I could throw in a WP:NOTMIRROR here, as these lists are just reproductions of similar pages on cricinfo. Spike &#39;em (talk) 11:44, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:22, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:22, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:22, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:22, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:22, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:22, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:22, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:22, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:22, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:01, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:22, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:22, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:22, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:22, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:22, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:22, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:22, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:01, 2 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom and the previous AfD for a similar list.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 15:28, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. It is my understanding that lists with three overlapping criteria have been specifically ruled against. With time I could imagine exemptions this is not one of them. (Dushan Jugum (talk) 20:49, 2 April 2019 (UTC)).
 * Delete far too specific - we really don't need a list for any of these; the only one that might be of special significance would be against England perhaps, but that's already been deleted. Blue Square Thing (talk) 15:31, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per nom. Stats should be kept to a minimum; in this case, it's overkill! StickyWicket (talk) 21:49, 3 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete - overkill of statistics. Orientls (talk) 06:06, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTSTATS and WP:NOTMIRROR. This is basic stuff that can be found on ESPNCricinfo. Ajf773 (talk) 08:50, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 12:45, 8 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete: per nom and above and more specifically WP:NOSTATS, whilst List of test cricket records may be acceptable this is a clea voilation of WP:NOTSTATS. SSSB (talk) 16:38, 9 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.