Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Australian Ambassadors to Colombia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 20:21, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

List of Australian Ambassadors to Colombia

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

the resident ambassador has not even happened yet, it's been announced. Most of the sources are about a non resident ambassador. Even if a resident Embassy is established, we don't create lists of 1. LibStar (talk) 10:10, 19 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep. Well-sourced, comfortably surpasses WP:GNG. The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 11:13, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
 * 9 of the 12 sources are government sources and not third party coverage. LibStar (talk) 11:17, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
 * here's an analysis of the sources. 5, 6 and 9 make zero mention of Colombia. 7,8, 10 and 11 make a one word mention of Colombia and are about other diplomatic relations especially Chile. This article comfortably fails WP:GNG . LibStar (talk) 16:32, 19 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep. It's very clearly not a list of 1 and includes a referenced explanation of the evolution of Australia's presence in Colombia, which is more than just trivial information. There are other Ambassador list pages that have much less information or direct references than this one.Siegfried Nugent (talk) 00:52, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
 * WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. yes it's a list of non resident ambassadors which can be adequately covered in other articles. LibStar (talk) 08:41, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
 * OTHERSTUFFEXISTS arguments can be valid or not valid, but it is valid to compare this page to the state of information/referencing in other list pages that still exist (and have done for a long time, including ones that have no consensus for deletion). Given the level of coverage and references, notability has been established.Siegfried Nugent (talk) 09:02, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
 * It also includes a list of the Consuls-General/Trade Commissioners that have been appointed to Bogota since 2012 (including a wiki-linked former non-resident ambassador). So your claim that they are all non-resident is incorrect.Siegfried Nugent (talk) 09:07, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
 * we rarely create list of Consuls-General because they don't have ambassador status. But really this is a list of non resident ambassadors, consuls and to be assigned ambassador.  LibStar (talk) 09:17, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
 * So clearly, not just a list of one, and each part of that list is explained and referenced. The (albeit pending) appointment of an Australian ambassador, and the recent (last 5 years) development of Australia's presence in Colombia is a notable topic that has been covered in Australian and international press.Siegfried Nugent (talk) 09:42, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 23:09, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 23:09, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 23:09, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 23:09, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colombia-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 23:09, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  J 947 (c)  01:50, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - lots of relevant information from a decent variety of sources, appears to easily meet GNG.PohranicniStraze (talk) 04:31, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. - As above, well references, comfortably passes WP:GNG. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deathlibrarian (talk • contribs)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.