Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Australian contemporary artists


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-11 09:24Z 

List of Australian contemporary artists

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

An almost empty, unmaintained list that is better served by a category Delete Steve (Slf67)talk 05:16, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Unmaintained, empty. Criteria for inclusion are arbitrary and POV. Resolute 05:24, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete useless/empty/orphaned. /Blaxthos 05:31, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom--Peta 05:37, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete insufficient people on it to be separate from artists or elsewhere. cheers, Casliber | talk  |  contribs 10:19, 7 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.  -- Bduke 10:21, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. While this could be an appropriate list, no-one has been actively maintaining it. Capitalistroadster 05:14, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete The in-article instructions on how to fill in the blanks are longer than the content (discounting empty section headings) and POV. Better to be a category. --Scott Davis Talk 12:28, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Peta, Scott - I suggest discussing similar articles at the talk page regarding australian-relaed lists, and prodding them, before dragging them through here.Garrie 03:31, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * This is actually one of the few uncontentious ones. Others are generating enough debate that they'd have been summarily deprodded. --Steve (Slf67)talk 03:36, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I agree - I prodded the first three I nominated, and two had to come here anyway. If you think there are more that won't get contested, please prod them and list at talk:Lists of Australians. --Scott Davis Talk 15:06, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete This would be better as a category. -- Chairman S. Talk  Contribs  09:52, 9 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.