Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Aviation archaeology websites & resources


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. WP:CSD, blatant attempt to promote the websites listed. Mgm|(talk) 11:29, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

List of Aviation archaeology websites & resources
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete - No real content, just a list of websites. Per Wikipedia NOT, this should qualify for deletion. Wacko  Jack O   05:25, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  — Wacko  Jack O   06:05, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  — Wacko  Jack O   15:07, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Disagree / Keep - the deletion criteria states The criterion does not apply to any article that makes any credible claim of significance or importance even if the claim is not supported by a reliable source. The article's lead makes such a claim, making a deletion argument moot. Check-Six (talk) 05:32, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Actually, that is the criteria for "speedy deletion". Wacko Jack O   05:37, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, that's correct. Nick-D (talk) 07:59, 1 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:NOTLINK and as it doesn't meet WP:WEB. Nick-D (talk) 07:58, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia isn't a link farm. -Atmoz (talk) 16:24, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Wow.  Just wow.  I cannot believe we are even discussing this, it fits SPEEDY DELETION criteria.  JBsupreme (talk) 20:46, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Blatantly against WP:NOTLINK.  ♪Tempo  di Valse ♪  23:49, 1 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.