Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Ayatollahs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  Sandstein  18:52, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

List of Ayatollahs

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Ayatollah is an honorific title, and its usage in such a way is a clear violation of Manual of Style/Titles. It's like having a List of His Excellencies or List of Right Honourables. This list is not comparable to List of popes or List of current Maraji, because "Ayatollah" is not a religious position. Secondly, Ayatollah is a title in use since the mid 20th century in Iran (See Ayatollahs), so it is not applicable to a 17th century Indian. Inclusion of a person in such a list, would also prone it to POV issues (See Ayatollah and discussions made in the talkpage Talk:List of Ayatollahs Talk:List of Ayatollahs). I propose deleting this list. Pahlevun (talk) 11:40, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2020 October 8.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 12:07, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:16, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:16, 8 October 2020 (UTC)


 * We have a well developed and long lasting category system at category:Ayatollahs that corresponds to this list, which belies the nominator’s claims that this is not a proper way to index individuals. The talk page links the nom gives are just about individual entries, not questioning whether the list should exist at all. Can you point to prior project or talk page discussion on this broader question? If this AFD is the first place this content claim has been made, I don’t think it’s the best forum to be introducing a subject-specific question that may likely need expert knowledge to resolve. postdlf (talk) 12:51, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
 * It has been previously discussed at Categories for discussion/Log/2020 May 14 and my point is that "Ayatollah", unlike a Marja', is no religious position. It is simply a honorific title without a clear criteria for inclusion. There is no clear criteria for being addressed to as an "Ayatollah", which is also on Wikipedia a violation MOS:TITLES. Pahlevun (talk) 16:02, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
 * That CFD resulted in no consensus, and demonstrated a disagreement with your characterization of the subject and its significance. So that again weighs against your AFD here. I'd suggest continuing discussion on an appropriate Wikiproject or article talk page, and waiting until you get a higher level of participation as well as a clear consensus before trying to delete anything else. postdlf (talk) 16:57, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Which place do you think is the right place discuss this? Pahlevun (talk) 19:22, 8 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:CLNT and WP:NOTDUP. The list should stay; this is not the forum to discus individual entries. schetm (talk) 14:56, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
 * The question is not whether to listify or categorize "Ayatollah"s and this is clearly not a forum to discuss who should this list include. I am saying that no such list should exist on Wikipedia because Ayatollah is a title, not a position, and there is no clear criteria to address someone with that title. That violates WP:CLNT, which states lists should have a coherent and clear criteria for inclusion. It's just like having a List of Monsignors. There is no such system like a Church to grant people with the title Ayatollah (so that we would have something like List of Catholic saints). The problem is that an average English speaker thinks an Ayatollah is someone with a specific religious position like a Bishop. But academic sources do not use the word Ayatollah in the sense that Western media tend to use. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and should be written using scholarly sources. Moojan Momen has written about this in his various books. Pahlevun (talk) 16:17, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
 * The criterion for inclusion is, or should be, simple: list entries are demonstrated in reliable sources to have been granted the title Ayatollah or are widely known by the title Ayatollah. The problem of a misunderstanding of the term Ayatollah, can be easily solved by defining the term in prose in the lede. Maybe the list should be named; maybe a discussion on inclusion regarding who should be included in the list should take place, but the list serves points 1 and 2 of WP:LISTPURP well, and losing the list would be to the detriment of readers exploring the topic. schetm (talk) 19:04, 8 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep useful article, see WP:CLNT + WP:NOTDUP  -- Devoke water   (talk)  19:15, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep This is the kind of list many people will expect to find on Wikipedia, particularly for those unfamiliar with Iranian names who will need to work through a list to figure out exactly who they are looking for. If the list was a magnet for promotion of individuals there would be a problem, but with most individuals bluelinked that doesn't seem to be a problem. On the point that the use of the honorific is anachronistic in some cases - this may be objectively true, but if there are reliable sources referring to premodern individuals using this title and the title is in common use, even wrongly, then it is fine for us to reflect this in a list article. Mccapra (talk) 20:24, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Rename List of ayatollahs. The grammar police have spoken. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:11, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:00, 14 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep Perfect valid navigational list, grouping like items together. Any that you do not believe should be there, you can solve by normal editing methods.   D r e a m Focus  10:28, 15 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.