Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of BDSM topics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Discussion to merge should take place at the article's talk page. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  17:10, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

List of BDSM topics

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No function beyond a category, as with the AFD for List of hospice-related topics Benefix (talk) and WP:LISTCRUFT #7 Benefix (talk) 17:59, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - The list contains redlinks to requested articles, which can't be done with a category. &mdash; LinguistAtLarge • Talk  18:18, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions.  -- &mdash; LinguistAtLarge • Talk  18:19, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Linguist's point is excellent.— S Marshall   Talk / Cont  18:43, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I have the feeling most of those are redlinks to deleted articles. Benefix (talk) 19:58, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I've determined that 16 of the 78 redlinked articles (or 20%) were previously deleted via AfD or PROD. A few were previously speedy deleted as copyvio or nonsense. Dcoetzee 01:17, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment isn't Wikipedia supposed to have a contents and index navigation system in addition to search and category trees? 76.66.193.90 (talk) 07:35, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge with Glossary of BDSM  Lugnuts  (talk) 10:13, 7 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.