Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of BSP fixtures and Results 09-10


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. per WP:SNOW JForget  00:21, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

List of BSP fixtures and Results 09-10

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Procedural nom converted from endorsed PROD. Reason for prod was "Wikipedia is not a sport almanac. Relevant info is found at 2009–10 Football Conference." – PeeJay 10:16, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. – PeeJay 10:23, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - this article isn't needed as info is covered elsewhere. GiantSnowman 10:34, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - WP:NOT a fixture list, all the information needed is already contained in the article PeeJay points out. Future fixture list might also be copyrighted to the league.  If by some chance the article is kept, the title would definitely need changing, as "BSP" (a contracted form of "Blue Square Premier", the league's sponsored name) definitely isn't encyclopedic (and "Results" shouldn't have a capital R) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:36, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - I'm not sure who owns it, but someone (I think possibly the FA) owns the copyright on the fixture lists. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess) | (talk to me) | (What I've done)  14:57, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 * see Football DataCo. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 11:53, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I think you may be thinking of the Premier League/Football League/Scottish Premier League/Scottish Football League fixture lists. AFAIK, no one owns the copyright to the Conference fixtures. – PeeJay 15:03, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Fair enough, I did only say that the fixtures may be copyrighted. And that's not the reason why I feel the article should be deleted, it was just an aside really -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:07, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as original PRODer. Information already covered. --Jimbo[online] 11:30, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete a pointless list Spiderone  12:25, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Giant says it best. Wikipedia isn't the news, and it isn't the sports page.  Mandsford (talk) 13:04, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete since Wikipedia isn't the Sky Sports Football Yearbook. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess) | (talk to me) | (What I've done)  14:57, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, redundant to the main article. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 11:53, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.