Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Bad Girls: Extra Time episodes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nousernamesleft copper, not wood 23:11, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

List of Bad Girls: Extra Time episodes

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This article refers to a fan made video on internet site You Tube, which is allegedly a 'spin-off' from ITV series Bad Girls. The makers of the show and the station are NOT involved with the video, which features on-screen text only, referring to what the fan would have liked to have happened in the TV series. The site also offers NO references or sources. The article originally claimed the show was made by Shed productions who made the original TV series, thus being a lie. Therefore i see no purpose for this article other than to advertise the makers videos in a bid to receive more hits on the external site. This i believe constitutes not only a hoax but Spam. And i see no evidence as to why this article would be of interest to the reader, or for that matter what the purpose of it is. It is certainly not worthy of an article in an online encyclopedia in my opinion! Lisabutcherhill (talk) 23:32, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete The YouTube series doesn't have a page, nor does it seem to be the subject of any sources. Therefore, this supposedly inaccurate and unsourced list has no place on Wikipedia. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 23:46, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per the Hammer. /Blaxthos ( t / c ) 02:45, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per nom as non-notable web content. This is indeed a fan-made series consisting almost entirely of on-screen text. Basically, it is fan fiction with occasional music and frequent misspellings. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:44, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.   --  Wisdom89  ( T |undefined  /  C ) 08:12, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Neutral! the article does seem unencylopedic, but it could be cleaned up to a formal look. Dwilso (talk) 08:44, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Cleaning up the article's formatting doesn't address the verifiability and notability problems, though. Delete as non-notable fan-made media. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 17:57, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - List is completely unencyclopedic..not in format, but in content. There are no references, no hints at notability, and fails WP:INTERNET.  Wisdom89  ( T |undefined /  C ) 18:58, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Neutral With a lot of work, it could be made into a substantial article. -- Shark face  217  02:46, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
 * And like I said before, reformatting this article still wouldn't fix the verfiability and notability problems of the subject. This series hasn't been covered in reliable sources, so the article's got to go. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 21:35, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per NeoChaosX and all above. JohnCD (talk) 21:44, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per TenPoundHammer. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 05:35, 22 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.