Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Bayer 04 Leverkusen football transfers summer 2011


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to List of German football transfers summer 2011.  MBisanz  talk 00:11, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

List of Bayer 04 Leverkusen football transfers summer 2011

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is a pure content fork from the master List of German football transfers summer 2011 and from Bayer Leverkusen's 2011–12 season article. A discussion to split the master list (found here) failed to reach a consensus, with a majority opposing a split. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:37, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete . Transfers in a window for a single club are not notable and should be kept only at the national page, where they were originally merged from without consensus. C 679 18:42, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following articles for the same reason. (Please note that these articles were added after the delete !vote above). Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:43, 13 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:43, 13 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete All per original rationale at 18:42. C 679 18:46, 13 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete All per nomination. Remember to revert List of German football transfers summer 2011 when deleting. Op47 (talk) 20:22, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:00, 14 January 2013 (UTC)


 *  Keep or Redirect  - Since redirects are cheap, let's simply redirect all of the articles back to the main article, if they are not to be kept as articles. --Jax 0677 (talk) 00:28, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirects may be cheap, but in this case they don't add any value either. Given the complexity of the titles, they are not really plausible as search terms, and no article presently links to any of them. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:39, 14 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete all WP:NOT, a list of routine sports transactions per team isn't encyclopedic and its an unlikely search term. Secret account 01:00, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete all - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 09:50, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete all - This info should be in club season articles and in a summary of all transfers that happened in that transfer window. There is no reason for it to exist in standalone articles. – PeeJay 16:21, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete all as non-notable. — Ed! (talk) 16:42, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete all I go with what PeeJay said above, it should only be on either the club season page or a full transfer window article. As for some of you people saying "non-notable" or "no evidence of notability" I don't understand that, transfers of players always get plenty of coverage, this deletion is all about how we use information to represent the player transfers. So I sugest you use a better rationel. Govvy (talk) 14:12, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect all to List of German football transfers summer 2011 - to me this is a merge discussion, not a deletion discussion. These are non-notable content forks, and should be merged back to the list where they came from, and the redirects should be left in place. Mentoz86 (talk) 11:42, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge / Redirect all to the "Transfers" section of the relevant club season article (for example, 2011–12 Bayer 04 Leverkusen season). While player transfers are a valid subject for inclusion on Wikipedia, I don't feel they warrant a separate article (even if they were padded out with some prose - at the moment, these all consist of a single table). ★ Bald Zebra ★ talk 12:39, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.