Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Ben Matlock's clients


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the nomination was delete.  Sango 123  17:19, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

List of Ben Matlock's clients
Seems like a really pointless and nonnotable list to me; also only five list entries after 10 months on WP. NawlinWiki 01:14, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete There's already a List_of_Matlock_episodes with links to individual episodes. If the individual episodes are to be written-up then this list seems redundant. --IslaySolomon 01:18, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Islay. If there's any information not already in other Matlock articles, then merge, but I doubt that'll be necessary. &mdash; ዮም   (Yom)  |  contribs  •  Talk  •  E  02:07, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as Matlockcruft (this may be the first time that term has ever been used), although I know full well that I risk the wrath of Abraham Simpson.  young  american  (ahoy-hoy) 02:33, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as Matcruft. Cruftlock? Eh, whatever, it's a fancrufty and pointless list. --Core des at talk. o.o;; 03:41, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete cruft. --Icarus 06:12, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete listcruft Alphachimp   talk  13:22, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
 * delete - listcruft. -- Kungfu Adam ( talk ) 15:06, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unnecessary. 23skidoo 16:54, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, as per unnecessary, IsanSolomon and nom. -- Dom th  e  dude  0  0  1  18:01, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge into Ben Matlock. Green caterpillar 20:25, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Completely unnecessary. -- Alias Flood 22:04, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per all the above reasons. Carlossuarez46 19:50, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Merge would be OK too. &mdash; RevRagnarok  Talk Contrib Reverts 03:02, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.