Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Big Bash League centuries


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:39, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

List of Big Bash League centuries

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable list that could be merged into main article, but it does not need to be in it's own article. Fails WP:GNG. Qed237&#160;(talk) 12:50, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge into List of Big Bash League records and statistics. The Rambling Man (talk) 12:55, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge agree with above comment, the list isn't very long so can easily be merged.Atlantic306 (talk) 14:45, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Again, with the other BBL nomination, this is on the same level as the IPL. They have List of Indian Premier League centuries, which is a Featured List. This COULD become a featured list too (if someone puts the work in). No objection to a redirect with the possibility of it being restored to an article if improved to the FL standard. 18:47, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep There are 14 centuries that I think are enough.  GreenCricket  (talk)  11:45, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 01:27, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 09:33, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 09:33, 11 May 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep per similar IPL list. StAnselm (talk) 10:44, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect and merge as needed, still questionable at best for own article. SwisterTwister   talk  23:12, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:39, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep The argument for deletion is not strong. I don't know why this AfD was relisted, since consensus is not pointing to deletion. This might be a good time for closure, either by an admin or a non-admin. And Adoil Descended (talk) 15:12, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - a highly popular league with the worlds top players. Enough centuries to warrant a seperate article. If this was a lower level T20 league than yes there would be no need but as the BBL is one of the top T20 leagues it is appropriate - Yellow Dingo (talk) 12:08, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. Not that I'd object to a merge, but this list will only get bigger and would probably have to be broken out again later.  Why create extra work for ourselves?  Lankiveil (speak to me) 12:28, 24 May 2016 (UTC).


 * Keep Notable subject that generates significant coverage when it occurs. The list is small for now but will grow and be unwieldy to merge. Smartyllama (talk) 18:44, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment snow time. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:10, 25 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.