Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Billboard Korea K-Pop Hot 100 top 10 singles in 2011 (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tone 18:01, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

List of Billboard Korea K-Pop Hot 100 top 10 singles in 2011
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

All the information contained in these type of lists seems to fall under WP:IINFO. When the song entered the top 10, when it peaked, the number of weeks in the top 10 all seem extraneous. A previous discussion resulted in no consensus. There is List of Hot 100 number-one singles of 2011 (Korea) and the like as well, but there is both significance for and much more interest in songs which reached number one and coverage beyond the chart provider is not difficult to find. A top 10 seems a bit more arbritary (it could be top 20, top 40, or why not the entire hot 100). Lists of number twos have been deleted in the past, so why do we need entire top 10s. This also isn't even the main national chart in Korea, so this sets up top 10 for any and all published charts. -- Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 00:29, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:20, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:20, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:20, 29 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 01:01, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Ri l ey    00:34, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Delete, indiscriminate info with arbitrary cutoff. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 07:29, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:28, 18 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete all as nominated. Why this survived the first AFD is beyond me... — ξ xplicit  01:34, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.