Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Billboard Top Contemporary Christian Albums number ones of the 1990s


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 14:37, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

List of Billboard Top Contemporary Christian Albums number ones of the 1990s

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Number ones on a non-notable chart. Boleyn (talk) 10:46, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:50, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:50, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:50, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep There are other christian websites about christian billboard albums i.e the christianpost.com and christianbeat.org not just billboard/billboard magazine and radio. DanTheMusicMan2 (talk) 11:57, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:LISTN lists need to establish WP:N by being"discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources". No indication of this.  // Timothy ::  talk  14:41, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete because this seems to fail WP:LISTN. Since the subject doesn't appear to be talked about as a group or set anywhere except for in primary sources. Plus, Wikipedia isn't a directory. --Adamant1 (talk) 08:50, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep as Billboard charts are usually notable and this one should be in terms of christian music reliable sources. There are also plenty of blue links so it is a useful index page, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 19:27, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. Per WP:CHARTS, "a chart is normally considered suitable for inclusion if it meets both of the following characteristics: 1) It is published by a recognized reliable source. This includes...Billboard magazine... 2) It covers sales or broadcast outlets from multiple sources." See also WP:BILLBOARDCHARTS. pburka (talk) 22:27, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
 * FYI: this inclusion criteria is for what's allowed in chart tables for song and album articles (in which Billboard would be an independent source), not for lists of number ones (for which Billboard is a primary and often times the only source). That's not a !vote from me for or against this particular list. Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 23:25, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep: The chart's considered notable enough for its own article; a list from it meets LISTN.   Ravenswing     23:13, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 03:39, 11 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep I am not sure if it is extensively covered but still seems notable for now.  killer bee    05:54, 15 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.