Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Bobobo-bo Bo-bobo character fusions


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. ff m  00:04, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

List of Bobobo-bo Bo-bobo character fusions

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This list of characters does not establish notability independent of its series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. They are all pretty much one-shot gag characters that have no real importance outside of their one or two appearances (as with many jokes from television shows like The Simpsons and Family Guy). TTN (talk) 18:53, 19 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions.  -- --  Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 20:05, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete This one does not belong in an encyclopedia. The significant part of it is already in the main article, and the details are totally nonencyclopedic. There is thus no need for a further merge, and the article title is useless as a search term, so there's no use in redirecting from it. I am delighted to find at least one of these where I totally agree with TTN about what should be done. DGG (talk) 22:30, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and DGG. This is completely unencyclopedic and redundant. The relevant stuff is already where it belongs. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 23:23, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. When I originally created the page it was moreso to try and remove them from a growing page of other characters but in a sense it is just senseless joke characters that can be mentioned briefly and without spoilers in the article itself. -StrangerAtaru (talk) 01:46, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete original author weighed in, so I think it may be snowing. JuJube (talk) 03:58, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per all above. Stifle (talk) 14:31, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Everything was mentiont. After getting a short overwiev I can just agree.  abf  /talk to me/  19:40, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per (gasp!) DGG. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 22:28, 22 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.