Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Bollywood film clans


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy keep Anthony Appleyard 21:26, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

List of Bollywood film clans

 * – (View AfD) (View log)


 * User:Sarvagnya tagged it ; it looks sensible, but is it notable? Anthony Appleyard 10:48, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep as a verifiable though not currently verified article that appears to be notable. MLA 11:00, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - Lists some notable families and stars, and links them together conveniently in a way not possible by the individual personal and family articles alone. Was this really an AfD candidate? --DAJF 12:23, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep as it's a marginally useful familial rendition of noteable film stars. Majoreditor 12:43, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong keep Clear use and provides a good understanding of the backbone of the Bollywood film industry. Article tagged as "nonsense" due to the vendetta of the nominator, again I'm disappointed but to speedy it is destructive, would an admin please warn Sarvagnya, this has gone far enough ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦       "Talk"? 12:55, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep as eminently notable and copliant with guidelines for lists. Just because someone vandalised the article with it doesn't mean it has to be AfDed. Phil Bridger 12:56, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep - The only think I can say when I see that, is LOL. Oh and not only when I see that. There is something else. In brief, an important list of film clans, with prominent actors. Its use is clear. Shahid  •  Talk 2 me  13:09, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, appears to be notable and seems to serve the purpose that lists should.--h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 13:34, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong and speedy keep - and notify user who tagged it that such frankly irrational nominations for speedy deletion are not acceptable by policy and guidelines. John Carter 15:13, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
 * He's been notified of that before, see User_talk:Sarvagnya. Phil Bridger 15:49, 13 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete - utterly unencyclopedic. Sarvagnya 15:14, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - "Utterly unencyclopedic" is not one of the criteria for speedy deletion as pre WP:CSD. Strongly suggest that the above editor familiarize him/herself with those criteria before engaging in similar misuses of the template in the future. John Carter 16:25, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Exactly John! :) Shahid  •  Talk 2 me  16:40, 13 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment looks like a candidate for a WP:SNOW keep to me. Phil Bridger 20:00, 13 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.