Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Borderlands franchise characters


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. It's WP:SNOWing, and this AfD isn't going anywhere else. Black Kite (talk) 23:05, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

List of Borderlands franchise characters

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Video game fancruft. The coverage at Borderlands (series) is sufficient. Fails WP:N, WP:V, MOS:REALWORLD.  Sandstein  10:47, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.   Sandstein   10:47, 27 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete - The topic goes into unnecessary depth on in-universe details, failing the above mentioned guidelines and policies. It contains nothing necessary as an offshoot companion article. Each game can handle its own character summary, and there is the series article for those that are recurring. TTN (talk) 10:53, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:42, 27 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete and redirect to Borderlands (series). The edit history is not worth tolerating, but there is such a thing as Template:R to section. ミラP 14:48, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Expounded upon sufficiently in the main series article, but this is unreferenced cruft.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 18:28, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Absolute keep: No series-wide character list is to be deleted; all major series need them. Googinber1234 (talk) 05:20, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Here on Wikipedia, that is not a reason to keep.  GaɱingFørFuɲ 3 6 5 09:31, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete, seems to almost solely consist of in-universe material without any indicator of out-of-universe notability. Significant characters can be covered in the parent article. Seraphimblade Talk to me 23:38, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete – undersourced and is written like a gamer's geeky guide.  GaɱingFørFuɲ 3 6 5 09:31, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete or Redirect Article lacks WP:SIGCOV for a standalone entry. Chetsford (talk) 16:25, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment leaning "Weak Delete without prejudice to recreation with sources" - The Borderlands franchise is pretty huge. A quick search for sources finds a few as-a-group sources and plenty of sources on many of the individual characters, so I'm a little surprised to see just how far towards delete this is leaning. That said, the current article is a long block of material that's presumably built just from primary sources/OR, so I can't keep either and don't have the time to source it myself. I think this article is possible, but there's not much to merit keeping here. &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 16:31, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Begoon 17:15, 30 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete-almost completely unsourced and overly intricate fancruft. There's no useful or sourced content to merge anywhere. Reyk YO! 17:18, 30 September 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.