Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Brazilian-born footballers who have played for another national team


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 00:41, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

List of Brazilian-born footballers who have played for another national team

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unreferenced and trivial; consensus against this sort of list can be found here. GiantSnowman 17:28, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 17:29, 21 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Per nominator, trivial. --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 19:52, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:25, 22 November 2012 (UTC)


 * I note that the nominator didn't apply the same argument when recently dealing with the Scottish equivalent of this article. This appears to be another in the long list of cases of rampant pro-British bias amongst WikiProject Football participants. Phil Bridger (talk) 22:27, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I didn't notice the title of the Scottish article when editing with AWB - please remove your accusations of bias as entirely uncivil and unfounded. If consensus exists at this AfD then I will nominate the Scottish one as well. GiantSnowman 08:56, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
 * You edit articles without even reading their titles? What sort of an encyclopedia can we build when we have admins who do such things? Phil Bridger (talk) 09:03, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I said I didn't notice it, not that I didn't read it - at the time it didn't click that it could possibly be non-notable. It took me 5 days from editing this article to clocking that it could be non-notable. That's a difference. But hey, how can we build an encyclopedia with editors like you refusing to AGF? GiantSnowman 09:36, 23 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Let's see if we can create an article with the largest title in the history of evar! Huzzah! Seriously however, the list is trivial and should probably be deleted, alongside with the Scottish equivalent. The latter seems to list a couple of footballers who have received coverage regarding their decision to play for another national side other than Scotland, but having a separate article for those few is not encyclopedic. – Kosm  1  fent  08:47, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Too late. Someone already created Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo, which was a redirect to Darth Vader.  Nyttend (talk) 22:06, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Breaks my screen... -_- LOL. – Kosm  1  fent  07:17, 28 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - non-notable WP:LISTCRUFT. The Scottish equivalent should go too. Mentoz86 (talk) 18:36, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence of notability, notability implausible on the face of it. —chaos5023 (talk) 22:26, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.