Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Brighton Snowdogs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 21:19, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

List of Brighton Snowdogs

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I am also nominating the following related pages because [insert reason here]:

all of these, either promotional or art-cruft. either way it's non-encyclopedic. (will somone please check I added the multiple nom correctly)  DGG ( talk ) 23:35, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. ― Abelmoschus Esculentus  talk /  contribs 03:03, 2 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete non-notable cruft. This topic should be covered at Snowdog Art Trails. Catrìona (talk) 06:03, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:29, 2 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom Spiderone  10:07, 2 January 2019 (UTC)#
 * Keep or Merge These pages were seperated from the main article to prevent the info therein being split up by the lists. The lists themselves collate information which is valuable to those who are interested in the subject (bearing in mind these trails attract hundreds of thousands of visitors) and the information isn't available in one place anywhere else.


 * There are plenty of other lists of artworks on Wiki already, including (for example) List of Picasso artworks 1901–1910, as well as similar lists from other art trails (such as Wolves in Wolves).


 * Would a compromise be for me to move the info to the main page, under an expanding table as per Go_Superlambananas!?Retron (talk) 13:16, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
 * You can't compare these snowdog things to Picasso's works. You just can't. Spiderone  13:34, 2 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete I fail to see how these lists are encyclopedic.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 12:34, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete all. Unencyclopedic cruft. Ajf773 (talk) 19:12, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
 * As for the comparison with Picasso, see WP:EINSTEIN. The very idea of the comparison shows the reason for deletion.   DGG ( talk ) 04:33, 7 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.