Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Britain's Got Talent finalists


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Killiondude (talk) 20:40, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

List of Britain's Got Talent finalists

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article is more of a content fork for several articles that are covering each series of Britain's Got Talent. I can understand that some people want to list the finalist in this programme, but this list is a complete mess and duplicates information on finalists that articles on each series already cover. The lead also details information best reserved for the main article on the programme - If this was a List of Episodes, it wouldn't be an issue. GUtt01 (talk) 19:29, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment: If there is good consensus for Keep, then I hope that those who opt for it, can at least rectify that list and clean it up when this discussion ends, please? GUtt01 (talk) 18:47, 11 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep as this seems a valid topic for a list on a very popular subject and saves time for people having to go through each article to find the finalists and this list gives more useful information than is available in a category. Also a number of the entries are notable and problems with the prose can be edited out. Atlantic306 (talk) 19:54, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 20:44, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 20:44, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 20:44, 10 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep - I agree with above. List is useful.BabbaQ (talk) 18:08, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. The nomination appears to be an appeal for cleanup, it is a pretty tawdry article but lists often are. Szzuk (talk) 14:24, 12 March 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.