Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of British entomological publishers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Possibly expand scope to List of entomological publishers. Espresso Addict (talk) 16:00, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

List of British entomological publishers

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

See WP:IINFO and WP:NOT. Not sure if these companies are even notable. Also, seems pretty random; we don't have List of American entomological publishers, or even List of entomological publishers. Delete.  ~EdGl (talk) 15:46, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep the individual companies just have to be suitable, content, not individually notable (though at least some of them are). That we don't have an article on American, (and others) can be remedied easily enough in the obvious way--or by expanding the scope of this article to international.DGG (talk) 17:35, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Obviously not indiscriminate or random. Colonel Warden (talk) 07:40, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 14:03, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 14:03, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Why are entomological publishers notable enough to warrant a list? Wikipedia is not a directory of book publishers in RandomFieldX, even on an international scale. -- Nick Penguin ( contribs ) 02:40, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - essentially random list, as indictaed by nom. Eusebeus (talk) 08:39, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per DGG's points. Would be very useful to those in that field.--Alf melmac 15:36, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per Lists (discriminate and verifiable). Sincerely, --  Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles  Tally-ho! 17:03, 15 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.