Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Buddha claimants


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was KEEP. postdlf (talk) 05:40, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

List of Buddha claimants

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

No reliable sources after two years with tag requesting some WP:GNG. Seem to also fail to meet WP:LISTN  petrarchan 47 T c 04:31, 8 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep I believe it is succeeded in WP:IRS in searching out the reflist and yes Buddha claimants are notable facts.--GoShow (...............) 18:01, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Seems inherently notable without doubt, and the problem is one of sourcing, not notability. WP:V means we need to try to source them, and it must be possible, not that it is complete. That no one has yet done this isn't a valid reason to delete, particularly since all have articles, and any failure of sourcing that runs afoul of BLP can be cured by the editing process.  Dennis Brown -  2&cent;    &copy;   Join WER 20:18, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - I checked a few of the claimants, and the claim is sourced in some of the respective articles in the list; the problem isn't one of sources not existing, but rather the issue is that the article needs to be cleaned up and sourcing provided in this article as well as the respective articles. That can be solved through editing, deletion isn't required or warranted. - SudoGhost 16:25, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.