Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Bush administration puns


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete, and of course, anything by Bush is BJAODN-able. ;) - Mailer Diablo 08:27, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

List of Bush administration puns
Original research, POV, and unverifiable silliness. Crabapplecove 03:49, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Stormscape 04:25, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong keep. (possibly speedy keep ???) This is a list of other, notable, WP articles, covering hot political issues. I don't see how a list of WP articles is "POV" or "original research" -- the criteria for deletion haven't been established. linas 05:03, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Axe this evil article. --Merovingian - Talk 05:07, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete actually only three of the pun links out of nine refer to wikipedia articles that are relevant and only one has external source, which actually gives 0 relevant google hits. Hence, delete by WP:OR. -- Koffieyahoo 05:40, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia is not a jokebook, or the Onion. Also, these jokes mostly suck. -- GWO
 * Delete no barrel left unscraped... Just zis Guy you know? 13:06, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unencyclopedic topic, as shown by the lack of an article on Bush administration puns. Usually, an article on X should be created before creating a "List of X." Dpbsmith (talk) 15:22, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Destroy POV  Gang sta EB   ~(penguin logs) 16:59, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:OR. -Royalguard11Talk 17:46, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:BOLLOCKS Rob 20:12, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * BJAODN and strong keep per Linas. -TrackerTV 20:17, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * BJAODN per TrackerTV. &mdash;Hanuman Das 00:19, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
 * While basically true (ha), highly unencyclopedic in tone and not funny enough for BJAODN. Delete. Jacqui ★ 20:19, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Very interesting for non-US-users. Strong keep. --213.155.224.232 10:57, 27 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.