Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of CBeebies shows


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 00:03, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

List of CBeebies shows

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Completely unsourced. Fails WP:NOTTVGUIDE. Foxnpichu (talk) 21:22, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment Not COMPLETELY unsourced because it links to the Cbeebies website's list of shows, though the citations are not given in-line and it does not indicate where on that page each program can be found (if they can be found) so not verifiable. This is basically a category page and would probably be acceptable if reformatted as such. FOARP (talk) 22:20, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 05:09, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 05:09, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 05:09, 19 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep You have an entire list of shows that have articles linking to them and have sources in them. Known network with plenty of programming. I'm usually for these types of deletions, but mainly for channels that mainly carry reruns and originate negligible new content. This airs plenty of new content. WP:SOFIXIT.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 05:13, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. TV channel broadcast lists should be limited to original programming. Otherwise listing every single acquired programme that has appeared both currently and in the past, without adequate sourcing to verify this, is original research. Ajf773 (talk) 06:10, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep per Mrschimpf - a notable network with its own programming, many of them with their own articles. The absence of sources does not mean sources don't exist. The topic is notable. The article needs fixing, sure, but that does not mean deletion. Per NOTTVGUIDE: "...historically significant program lists and schedules may be acceptable." A list of programs on a major international channel is acceptable to me. Nothing in NOTTVGUIDE (or anywhere else that I'm aware of) states program lists must be original shows only anyway. -- Whats new?(talk) 10:56, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
 * If we are going to keep the article, can we work together to remove unsourced and unneeded clutter? How are we supposed to identify that those dates are accurate? BBC Genome does not have every single schedule in existence. Foxnpichu (talk) 19:38, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep -- TVGUIDE seems to not be applicable here. This is a bounded list of programming on a network -- the majority of which is notable -- as opposed to a schedule. matt91486 (talk) 02:27, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep a completely valid list article and easily sourceable. These are mostly original programming produced for the network, and many are notable.  There may be some need for cleanup. power~enwiki ( π,  ν ) 00:07, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep, though someone may want to remove the non-original programming as per above. --  No COBOL  (talk) 13:40, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. This is an informative and useful list that has encyclopaedic value, just what lists are supposed to be. -The Gnome (talk) 21:19, 24 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.