Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Canadian divisions in WWI


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 01:38, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

List of Canadian divisions in WWI

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

An extremely short list (5 items) devoid of any content. Aiken  &#9835;  12:48, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep I don't see the length as a problem, and I've added a little content. Could easily be expanded further. Polarpanda (talk) 13:15, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Useful list, but should be expanded. --JohnnyB256 (talk) 16:13, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:04, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:04, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:04, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Nominator has not given any valid reason to delete the article. The list is perfectly suitable for an encyclopedia.   D r e a m Focus  20:30, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep A useful list that should be enhanced further. No reason for deletion. Warrah (talk) 21:23, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep: An encyclopedic list. Joe Chill (talk) 21:40, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, List meets WP:SALAT. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 23:19, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep I'm glad to see that someone is adding content to the article. I'd call it more like "no reason now for deletion".  Had it not been for the nomination, it would not have improved, so hats off to the nominator as well as to the editors who addressed the problem.  AfD can be a win-win situation. Mandsford (talk) 02:21, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep There were only five Canadian Army divisions in World War I, so the list is entirely comprehensive. Shortness is not a reason for deletion anyway. Nick-D (talk) 21:41, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep: seems a valid list in my opinion. — AustralianRupert (talk) 00:50, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep List was not devoid of content when nominated and length of list is not valid reason for deletion. Edward321 (talk) 19:32, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.