Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Canadian winners on the PGA and LPGA Tours


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  11:17, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

List of Canadian winners on the PGA and LPGA Tours
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

As I stated earlier on the WikiProject Golf talkpage, this article strikes me as an obvious example of WP:OR and "synthesis." While a number of reliable third-party sources are used, I believe they have been "synthesized" to create an entirely new, "original" page. From my research, I have not found anything on the internet that could be used as direct source for this article. In addition, the author of List of Canadian winners on the PGA and LPGA Tours has yet to provide one.

I would like to hear opinions from other members below.

Thanks,

Oogglywoogly (talk) 01:27, 11 December 2021 (UTC)Oogglywoogly
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2021 December 11.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 01:27, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 02:01, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Golf-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 02:01, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 02:01, 11 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment. The verdict should also apply to List of Swedish professional golfers, which has similar criteria. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:09, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment. I firmly agree. I brought up List of Swedish professional golfers earlier this year on the talk page suggesting it should be deleted. That proposal was rejected in favor of "improving" the page. I did some edits on the page as did others but I still don't think those edits changed the OR flavor of the page, even remotely. I maintain the position that it should be deleted. Oogglywoogly (talk) 01:03, 13 December 2021 (UTC)Oogglywoogly
 * Disagree since the criteria of that list are not the same as those here; in other words, this is not List of Canadian professional golfers. Note: this comment should in no way be read as an endorsement of the Swedish pro golfers list or advocating creation of a Canadian (or any other nationality) one. wjematherplease leave a message... 13:23, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
 * @ wjemather : I guess you are technically right. There are small differences between these pages therefore this verdict should not apply elsewhere. However, I will create a proposal to delete List of Swedish professional golfers after discussion is closed here. Oogglywoogly (talk) 04:14, 15 December 2021 (UTC)Oogglywoogly

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 🌀 Locomotive207 - talk  🌀  03:35, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:LISTN due to an apparent lack of independent coverage of either of these intersections (Canadians and PGA Tour winners, and Canadians and LPGA Tour winners); WP:NOT (non-encyclopedic cross-categorizations and WP:NOTSTATS) is also of relevance here. wjematherplease leave a message... 13:15, 13 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment; this nomination was preceded by this discussion at WT:GOLF. wjematherplease leave a message... 10:51, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:LISTN. Media guide notes the PGA winners, but otherwise no significant coverage of the topic. Nigej (talk) 06:50, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete as failing WP:LISTN. Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page 22:52, 24 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.