Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Carnatic instrumentalists


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Keep Eluchil404 05:14, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

List of Carnatic instrumentalists
Listcruft. Purpose already served by the Carnatic instrumentalists category. cholmes75 (chit chat) 01:31, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Danielrocks123 02:30, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Page serves the purpose of listing musicians by instrument, which the category does not. It also provides a ready reference to start creating articles from. ImpuMozhi 02:48, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per ImpuMozhi. -  Ganeshk  ( talk ) 03:18, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - while I agree that cats are better form of organising info, they need not be the only form. For smaller categories where it doesn't make sense to create sub-cats, lists are a better alternative. Also, what ImpuMozhi said. --Gurubrahma 05:03, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per ImpuMozhi. However it needs inclusion of more notable people or articles created on notable people already in the list. -Ambuj Saxena (talk) 05:34, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per ImpuMozhi -- Samir  धर्म 06:41, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, redundant to category. --Coredesat 07:01, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per ImpuMozhi. It clearly serves a sorting purpose a category can't fulfill, so it's not redundant as Coredesat claims. - Mgm|(talk) 09:28, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. David L Rattigan 11:00, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per what ImpuMozhi said. Keresaspa 12:39, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per ImpuMozhi. List and category serves different purposes. --WinHunter (talk) 00:28, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. Changed my mind. --Coredesat 21:29, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.