Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Carnivàle awards and nominations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 02:09, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

List of Carnivàle awards and nominations

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Procedural nom Although similar pages like List of Lost awards and nominations and List of awards won by The Simpsons have achieved FL quality, I don't know whether Carnivàle needs the same type of list. For one, the show ran for only 24 episodes and seems rather obscure than highly-acclaimed (despite the number of awards, mostly in well-deserved technical categories). Next, this list is slightly redundant since nearly all awards are already listed in List of Carnivàle episodes, Characters of Carnivàle, and an overview at Carnivàle#Awards. Plus, wikipedia is not IMDb (award link) and this could set an IMO bad precedent. And finally (which is my main reason for this AfD), the four (old) articles of Carnivàle form a featured topic (link), and I doubt that I can improve this list to FL level to not lose that status. – sgeureka t•c 05:35, 1 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep or merge As long as we're documenting this information somewhere in the article series, I wouldn't be opposed to deletion or merging/redirection. -- Ned Scott 06:35, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.   -- Ned Scott 06:35, 1 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep per the already mentioned Lost and Simpsons awards lists that have reached FS. All the awards this show has won are notable (it just needs referencing). The awards information from the episode list page should probably be removed and put here instead. If the main reason you nominated it is to keep a topic featured, then work on getting the list featured. It shouldn't take too long at all. It's sort of like cherry picking to go AfDing pages that aren't yet up to scratch for FT inclusion. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 07:50, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - improve or merge. Silly reason. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 15:15, 3 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.