Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Cash Money Records artists


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Redirect to Cash Money Records. Per GFDL, I am not deleting any history. Also not merging content. Keeper  |   76   |   Disclaimer  20:28, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

List of Cash Money Records artists

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unsourced list of non-notable artists "currently and/or formerly signed to " a non-notable recording label. Damiens .rf 21:07, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as pointless listcruft, merge any bluelinks into label's own page. If the artists aren't notable (...enough to have WP pages of their own), they shouldn't be listed in a page such as this (doesn't aid readers or help WP organization). If there are only a handful (as it seems) that are notable, it's overkill to have a separate page just to list them. DMacks (talk) 23:05, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
 * So you think that it is WP:USELESS. Who are we to decide what is valuable content or not, and that should not be the reasoning for a deletion, Exit2DOS2000   •T•C•  06:09, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
 * No, I think that it is useless because it is WP:Listcruft and that I specifically was talking to its existence as a stand-alone article (note where say to merge content) because it makes WP navigation difficult. DMacks (talk) 06:26, 11 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Merge' into article Cash Money Records, and redirect link. The article has a list of artists in it already.  There's really no need to split it out, unless there were 100s of notable artists, past & present.  Lugnuts  (talk) 07:11, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
 * If the list was sourced, I could see merging it. But it isn't sourced at all, and nobody should merge unsourced content.  I recommend redirecting without merging or deleting, but could understand deleting.  GRBerry 19:22, 19 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.