Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Channels removed from Sky Digital


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Black Kite 21:40, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

List of Channels removed from Sky Digital

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

violates WP:NOT (Wikipedia is NOT for indiscriminate lists); list is non-sourced mhking (talk) 20:11, 21 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Strong delete As per before this was deleted as it not notable enough, the user went against consensus on the issue and split without takign ot talk first. But in the user fairness the main article requires to be split but no consensus on how to do it can ever be reached.-- Andy ( talk  -  contrib ) 21:08, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per Andrewcrawford (Andy)-- The Legendary   Sky Attacker  21:35, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 03:28, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 03:28, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - I would have said redirect to List of channels on Sky Digital, but they're already there. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess) | (talk to me) | (What I've done)  09:09, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not needed since the info is already in the Sky Digital article. Niteshift36 (talk) 13:52, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete on the basis that they're already in the main list of channels, I've used this list before, and isn't that the point in an encyclopedia? The information is relevant. Esteffect (talk) 17:30, 24 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment Although the article needs split the channels remove is not notable, however maybe channels that have closed down to finical diffuclites etc might be but it iwll require a lot of work to make it notable. it would solve some problesm on this article and similar one but not fully as it only reduce the size down a little-- Andy ( talk  -  contrib ) 18:58, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Former channels are notable - It's information that is useful, and if the channels have articles, why wouldn't they be? Esteffect (talk) 15:19, 25 June 2009 (UTC)


 * This is what i am suggesting, former channels that have closed down in the uk, but not spefic to sky or virgin or any platform, if it spefic to one platform it is not notable-- Andy ( talk  -  contrib ) 16:10, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.