Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Christian media organizations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn. postdlf (talk) 23:48, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

List of Christian media organizations

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The page, despite being several years old, is still largely blank and not likely to be topped up soon. As well as a lot of blank sections, it's also a list of links to other lists. Dmol (talk) 19:37, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:39, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:40, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:40, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:40, 5 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment – The article is not largely blank at all. You just have to click/select on the "show" links buttons in the sections. North America1000 20:41, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment - That is true, but very strange. I am guessing this will end up being kept, and if so, I suggest reformatting. Lady  of  Shalott  23:19, 5 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep – Qualifies for an article per WP:NOTDUP relative to Category:Christian media and subcategories therein, and is also a functional navigational aid per WP:LISTPURP. North America1000 20:42, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Reply. Thanks for pointing out the "show" button. (On my old computer, I had to refresh to get the page to work).  That certainly changes things. As nominator, can I withdraw the AFD nomination, or do we just have to let it run its course. --Dmol (talk) 23:30, 5 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.