Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Christina Aguilera B-sides and unreleased songs (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Merge was done - article redirected (NAC) Mayalld (talk) 08:42, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

List of Christina Aguilera B-sides and unreleased songs
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Sufficient time (over 5 months) has elapsed to complete a merge as required by the first AfD, and no progress has been made. Complete deletion is recommended as better than leaving this article in existence indefinitely. Rogerb67 (talk) 23:27, 20 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   —Rogerb67 (talk) 23:31, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.   —Rogerb67 (talk) 23:43, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.   —Rogerb67 (talk) 23:43, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete G6 The merge to the discography appears to have been done, so this can be speedy deleted as a non-controversial final step of the original AFD. Mayalld (talk) 07:24, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * ' Keep or Merge' - a merge !vote is/was not considered binding, nor is it a reason to delete if the merge was not done (in spite of the fancy new templates). Simple deleting would lose the verifiable information. Deletion is meant as a last resort - editors who don't like this list should do the merge, not push for deletion. This is a simple case of improvement, no? The exact opposite of a WP:delete candidate. The speedy tag claiming that the merge is complete, therefore deleting is non-controversial simply seems to be wrong in this case.Yobmod (talk) 08:29, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * It looks like the merge has already been done, so this can simply be redirected as a viable search term. The concurrent AfD and speedy tag is very confusing, as they give opposite reason to delete (AfD = merge not done, Speedy = merge complete!).Yobmod (talk) 08:37, 21 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.