Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Churches affiliated with Australian Christian Churches


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete -- JForget 00:50, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

List of Churches affiliated with Australian Christian Churches

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

The vast majority of these churches are not notable and will not/should never have an article: Wikipedia is not a directory. Churches affiliated with Australian Christian Churches exists which gives more encyclopaedic content. &mdash;Moondyne 03:10, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.   —&mdash;Moondyne 03:14, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOT, list of loosely associated topics. Ten Pound Hammer  • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 03:17, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOT and the fact the somewhat superior article highlighted by the nominator exists. Orderinchaos 03:18, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I can't agree that this a a list of loosely associated topics; they are a small subset of the various local churches of a denomination. This is perfect for a category, especially in the presence of the main article.  Since we have both a category and the main article, and we should probably never have articles on even half of the local churches, we are better off without the list.  GRBerry 03:32, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for pointing that category out. There does appear to be unnecessary content forking happening here.  As well as the nom'd article and the parent at Australian Christian Churches, we have:
 * National President of Australian Christian Churches
 * Churches affiliated with Australian Christian Churches
 * Bible colleges affiliated with Australian Christian Churches
 * National Conference of Australian Christian Churches
 * National Executive of Australian Christian Churches
 * State Executive of Australian Christian Churches
 * Ministries of Australian Christian Churches
 * List of people associated with Australian Christian Churches
 * I think several merges should be considered. &mdash;Moondyne 03:47, 2 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete: Per the above, NOT. - Rjd0060 04:34, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom. Twenty Years 06:05, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete all per nom. Churchcruft. These topics have no independent notability.-h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 12:25, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete All, cruft. Also, all the information is carried in the other, much superior article cited in the nom.  Lankiveil (talk) 08:33, 5 December 2007 (UTC).
 * Redirect to Churches affiliated with Australian Christian Churches given that all the content can be found there. Capitalistroadster (talk) 08:38, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Note that I don't think that all the pages Moondyne listed should be deleted, especially not as a result of this AFD. They were nominated too late for the party in my opinion, and I also believe some should be merged, as he/she explicitly said.  So my opinion above is to delete only the one article nominated originally.  GRBerry 14:25, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Agree. I didn't mean to imply this discussion was broadened to include those articles.  They need separate discussion/s, and I wouldn't be suggesting they all go in any case. &mdash;Moondyne 15:24, 5 December 2007 (UTC).
 * Delete as per WP:DIRECTORY, WP:IINFO (well, the closest policy I could get to 'a collection of info) and WP:NOR (along with WP:NOT). It doesn't appear that this list is published as a whole already. Correct me if I'm wrong. Auroranorth (!) 13:19, 6 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.