Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Cinco Family products


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. consensus after relisting  DGG ( talk ) 02:23, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

List of Cinco Family products

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The list is trivial. Fails WP:GNG. Koala15 (talk) 04:07, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 09:25, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 21:17, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Merge with Tim and Eric Awesome Show, Great Job! or possibly keep. DanielPenfield (talk) 08:38, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Music1201  talk  14:49, 19 July 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:57, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete- this is classic fancruft. Poorly sourced, overly detailed directory of trivial fictional things. Merging anything of this stuff into another article would make that article worse. Reyk  YO!  10:49, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment - I've reopened my WP:NPASR closure on contentions from two editors. Regards— UY Scuti Talk  10:06, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. As stated above in the clearly cited policies and guidelines that this article clearly fails, it's unencyclopedic because it's indiscriminant and non-notable WP:FANCRUFT WP:N.  There is no hope of notability, and no hope of coverage by reliable sources.  It is ideal for an outside fan site like wikia.  The closest we could have would be if the article for the overall series cited a review which mentioned select Cinco products by name, as part of prose.  But that has nothing at all to do with this article, which is a huge waste of effort for Wikipedia.— Smuckola(talk) 18:29, 2 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.