Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Columbia Pictures films (1990–1999)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 20:23, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

List of Columbia Pictures films (1990–1999)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I couldn't find sources to add to show it meets WP:NLIST / WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 18:54, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: This article is a helpful reference and serves a navigational purpose. The list's notability is only a minor concern. Lists of films by major studios, such as Columbia Pictures, document cultural history and provide insight into cinematic trends of a specific era. These lists do not need additional sources to meet the notability guidelines. They are notable because they include famous films, and the studio is famous.--AstridMitch (talk) 19:24, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Lists.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:40, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep. Yes. Obviously a split of Lists of Columbia Pictures films. No particular issue with those lists.- My, oh my! (Mushy Yank)  21:27, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: It's unclear why these lists are getting nominated, or why the OP keeps nominating more without waiting for consensus. Obviously Columbia Pictures and its films are notable, see Columbia Pictures: A Century of Hollywood Motion Picture Magic and Columbia Pictures: Portrait of a Studio. The current state of sourcing in the article is not relevant for notability; that can be fixed by editing. Keep per WP:NEXIST. Toughpigs (talk) 16:51, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete One-sourced article and better covered by Category:Columbia Pictures films and 'films by year' and films by year' genre cats. Nomination is pretty clear to build consensus for future deletions of 'list of studio's film by decade' articles, which are all covered and duplicated by each "(year) in (nation) film" articles that have much better sourcing and don't have to deal with 'studio stan' editors. Any article within reason can be nominated for deletion at any time.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 23:07, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep No, nominating just one page in what's clearly a set is bad form, and if they want future deletions to succeed, maybe they should get one to work before nominating several at once. This is organized by release date and is far more useful than massive alphabetical categories. I don't think 'studio stan' editors are an issue with straightforward list like this. Reywas92Talk 15:04, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep as a valid split from the main article, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 21:19, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep This is a valid list article. All information can be found in the articles linked to. If you want to copy the references over for some reason you can, but its not needed for list.  D r e a m Focus  13:18, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep Yet another unnecessary "Candidate for Deletion" for a major studio. That Article Editing Guy (talk) 22:01, 20 July 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.