Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Comunal Documents of Santa Margherita Ligure


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. whether or not lists of planets exist,there is consensus against this one. Star  Mississippi  02:18, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

List of Comunal Documents of Santa Margherita Ligure

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I have no idea at all what the actual purpose of this article is. A municipality of less than 10,000 inhabitants has a number of official documents available for inhabitants, just like most other communities in the world. Why it would be a good idea to have an article that informs us that Santa Margherita Ligure has an "Application for household allowance 2022", a "Request form 1 hour in Blue zone for residents only" or a "Specification for home composting" is unclear. If you need a formal reason, total lack of notability. Fram (talk) 09:57, 17 May 2022 (UTC) I see concerns over the purpose of an article like this however I firmly believe that wikipedia articles warrant more detail and with both Santa Margherita Ligure and Contern I’m attempting to sort of set an example if you will. Of the absolute maximum which isn’t excessive. I also am quite certain that this isn’t excessive as there are many communes which have various documents but Santa Margherita Ligure has a lot more than anywhere else ive seen and also has far more variety. Additionally the town is more than a town of 100000 it has a rich history, intricate and sceneic geography, a large tourism industry and is famous amongst many parts of italy unlike most other towns of 10000. Therefore it warrants more détail generally which I feel includes the list of documents. I would make it a part of the main article but there is simple too many of them. This is a necessary step in the expansion of the article of the original town. Also due to the intricate geography and large ammounts of tourism in the town. Most documents are more notable as they often refer to road closures, beach closure and what can affect a larger number of people. Finally Wikipedia is no stranger to lists like this, I’m trying to take a step to make wikipedia more detailed when it comes to municipalities and towns. Sure it might be the tinyest bit excessive but Wikipedia changes and also the larger this article is, the more people will be detered into expanding other articles on the site N1TH Music (talk) 12:31, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 09:57, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Most of what you claim is WP:OR and generally misguided, but I guess others will chime in here and set you straight. I just wondered about your claim "Wikipedia is no stranger to lists like this", as I have never seen a list ecven remotely comparable to this one. Fram (talk) 12:47, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Can people who comment here please also look at this? Ignoring the potential copyvio issues (straight translations of the community website), someone needs to explain to N1th Music why this doesn't belong in an encyclopedia... Fram (talk) 13:06, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I don't know what you mean by straight translations I'm not taking an entire page and translating it I only use one part and always make changes. I know well also what Original Research is and I can see quite clearly that I cited many sources which you literally just accused me of completely copying. ""Wikipedia is no stranger to lists like this", as I have never seen a list even remotely comparable to this one." The ISO lists although more notable are just like this. A long list of similar Items most of which don't have their own article, with plenty of references and small descriptions. I'm refereing to the lists with the larger numbers. Those article were one of the main reasons I thought this was Notable N1TH Music (talk) 15:43, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * ISO lists are standards which are used worldwide, not documents used in one village... Fram (talk) 17:54, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I am aware but there's 100,000 of those 90% of which are nomore notable to an ordinary individual than some of the documents there will be here if I'm able to complete the article N1TH Music (talk) 18:28, 17 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate depository of anything, particularly communal documents. Jacona (talk) 18:57, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Then what about the lists of minor planets they're no more useful than this (at least if I'm able to actually complete the article) and there's over 600 of those articles. Some of them are a list of 1000 planets, 0 of which have enough information to warrant an article about them in particular, 0 of them have even been photographed and 0 of them have even been named and 0 of them affect anyone (even hardcore space fans) at all. On the other hand this article (once finished) is to be a complete list of every document some of which have had decent affects on the town. Such as the regulations and the ordinances. They have had an effect on some of the 10,000 residents and sometimes on some of the several thousand tourists which visit the commune. N1TH Music (talk) 14:47, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
 * sounds like it would be excellent for the commune’s website.Jacona (talk) 15:25, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
 * The Individual files are there but there's no complete list. Also you didn't address the existence of the Minor Planet lists. Also many people I know refer to wikipedia for basically anything. I still firmly believe that a mere list of all the documents with references for people who want details is notable and useful. Also the commune's website is in Italian N1TH Music (talk) 16:02, 18 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.