Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Controversial Anime


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete-- JForget 23:45, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

List of Controversial Anime

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Yet another indiscriminate list of information waiting to happen. "Controversial" is such a vague (and inherently POV) term that I don't see how this could ever be encyclopaedic. —  iride scent   (talk to me!)  19:33, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Also nominating


 * Delete Nom says it all -- how "controversial" is controversial anyway? This is a POV disaster waiting to happen. Ten Pound Hammer  • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 19:51, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt the earth with this. The article not only is a POV problem but written in such a way I got a headache from it.  Take two Deletes and call me in the morning -- Brian ( view my history )/( How am I doing? ) 20:30, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt Vague and article creator is stretching WP:OWN to meet his own opinions only. Nate 21:01, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment I've also added List of Live Action Anime by the same creator —  iride scent   (talk to me!)  21:09, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, Salt "Controversial" in whose opinion? There is no way I can see that a good encyclopaedic article could be found under this title. Sheffield Steel talkstalk 21:13, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt -- since the original author won't let anyone add to or subtract from that list, and since it lacks any source watsoever, I say it's definitely both a WP:OWN and WP:NPOV offence. The style of writing in that "article" is also not up to wiki standards. -- azumanga 01:05, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. Edward321 01:30, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete and SALT. I agree with many opinions above.  This is a deliberate and blatant infringement of WP:OWN, hence the SALT, and it's impossible to determine membership on the list by reference to any outside authority.  And if it was staying around, it would need to be re-written from scratch in coherent English. Accounting4Taste 01:46, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, inherently subjective. NawlinWiki 02:40, 29 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.