Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Crealude video games


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui 雲 水 12:04, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

List of Crealude video games

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A list of games without any stand-alone notability, by a developer that does not have an article on it. Fails WP:GNG / WP:LISTN.

There are three games listed. In the WP:VG/RS custom Google search engine, they all three get very little to no results.


 * Mind Run is listed at GameSpot, and that's the only mention.
 * Digi Follies gets zero results
 * Word War 5 is only mentioned in a list of similar games

There's no coverage on developer Crealude either. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 06:44, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions.  dibbydib  boop or snoop 06:51, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  dibbydib  boop or snoop 06:51, 12 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete fails WP:GNG and is not likely to ever meet it; showing that something exists does not mean it is worthy of an article  dibbydib  boop or snoop 06:53, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. The company is non-notable, and so are its games. Why have a list about a non-notable topic's non-notable sub-topics? In response to the nom, the one GameSpot hit for Mind Run is a database entry pulled straight from GameFAQs, which is user-authored and not reviewed by GameSpot/CBS Interactive staff. Digi Follies and Word War 5 have very (very) brief reviews in one issue of Next Generation, but I wasn't able to find any further sourcing that went deeper than those five sentences on the web or in the Internet Archive. IceWelder  &#91; &#9993; &#93; 08:28, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
 * So someone redirected two articles that were two years old to here, and decided to put all their games listed in one article. The games listed that got reviewed in reliable sources are notable enough to have their own articles.  I suppose since those articles were so short and no one felt like expanding them, the person figured to just merge them here.   D r e a m Focus  09:16, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Remind me again how one review of six sentences constitutes notability? That's not significant coverage. (who probably isn't aware of this discussion) likely created both in good faith, but they would have been candidates for deletion themselves regardless.  IceWelder  &#91; &#9993; &#93; 10:11, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Company is non-notable and neither are any of the titles on the list. Fails WP:GNG as well as WP:LISTN. Ajf773 (talk) 09:31, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - Clearly does not establish any notability, and neither do any of their games. I see no reason to keep this. Namcokid  47  (Contribs) 22:41, 17 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.