Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Current Newsround Presenters


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Stifle (talk) 08:57, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

List of Current Newsround Presenters

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This is something of a laundrey list for Newsround presenters. Knowing about which presenters do/did what to this degree of accuracy is not notable, and the whole list could be condensed and placed in the parent article, Newsround. Talk Islander 09:40, 2 September 2008 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  Xymmax  So let it be written   So let it be done  13:34, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  Xymmax  So let it be written   So let it be done  13:34, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mr.Z-man 04:12, 7 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  TravellingCari  03:24, 11 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment - how many times does a AfD get relisted to generate more discussion? IMO, if there have been no comments for deletion after the first relisting, the second should default to keep.  Lugnuts  (talk) 07:13, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
 * There's hardly consensus to keep, though, just as there's no consensus to delete. Relisting is the only option. Talk Islander 08:15, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge to Newsround or rertitle to list of Newsround presenters. Current is something which entrenches recentism. Hiding T 10:56, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
 * See I tend to think just the opposite of talk. If people can't be bothered to comment than the nomination itself suggests "consensus" to delete. Either way as fat as this particular one goes and having only seen it Merge to appropriate section at Newsround. No need to spinout an article when the section within the main article will never grow "out of control" and is relatively easy to maintain. Jasynnash2 (talk) 12:04, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not a suitable encyclopedia article on it's own. Not against a merge either.  --HighKing (talk) 12:02, 13 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.