Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of D.Gray-man terms


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   '''Delete. Mostly original research with little likelihood of enough sources showing up to support an article of this depth. Moreover, the plot is not widely notable'''. Gwen Gale (talk) 03:15, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

List of D.Gray-man terms

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The article has no sources or out-of-universe info, meaning it's filled with original research, for one. For another, a similar list of terms was deleted back in 2006; the result of the debate can be viewed at Articles for deletion/List of terms in Shakugan no Shana. Plus, there is certainly a large amount of plot information given, and Wikipedia is not a plot summary.  十  八  02:07, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions.   —  十  八  02:10, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete (or merge if anything is of value); in-universe, nn D.Gray-man material. JJL (talk) 02:10, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep Kind a gray area. I say keep. --Firefly322 (talk) 04:48, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Most of the information can be found on other pages; the fallen one term is used once, twice maybe. Many can be moved. itzjustdrama (talk) 01:02, 30 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails WP:NOT. Should be summarized in a "Plot" or "Setting" section in the main article. Sephiroth BCR  ( Converse ) 23:16, 30 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.