Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Dance Dance Revolution characters


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. --Ezeu 05:29, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

List of Dance Dance Revolution characters
Even though I am a DDR player, I don't think this page has encyclopedia value SYSS Mouse 13:52, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * UPDATE: You may want to read this thread


 * Delete - agreed --Rehcsif 13:56, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Yep. I also love DDR, and I also think this article is (encyclopedically) worthless. -- Kicking222 16:21, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete This article is completely unnecessary. There is no need for a Wikipedia entry outlining the statistics of the dancing characters featured in Dance Dance Revolution. Dj HaQ 18:29, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - There are pretty much no games where a list of its characters would be less relevant. I didn't even know DDR had "characters" (and no thats not a reason to keep it).  Wickethewok 18:54, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * They have in earlier arcade releases in Japan and also in some console releases. SYSS Mouse 03:23, 28 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions.   -- ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk  to Nihonjo e  19:40, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjo e  19:40, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. HotWings 20:04, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, as a DDR player, I must also agree that this is a worthless article. The DDR characters don't even have any backstory, unlike, say, the beatmania IIDX characters (though they don't really need an article either). --Coredesat talk 21:33, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, so we can redirect Fancruft here. I mean, delete. &mdash; Haeleth Talk 22:46, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Haeleth. Nice one. - Wickning1 23:58, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. Ace of Sevens 00:17, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Needs to have verifiable sources and needs to be distilled to simple core statements of facts (rather than crufty lists of trivia), but the essence of the article is worth keeping. - CNichols 20:19, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a game guide etc etc etc Bwithh 22:11, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Rubbish. +Falcon9x5 19:11, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.