Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Digimon World characters


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The one "keep" opinion does not address relevant guidelines and practices, or the arguments for deletion.  Sandstein  07:54, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

List of Digimon World characters

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This page consists exclusively of fancruft. It fails WP:GAMEGUIDE and WP:GNG. Fangusu (talk) 06:23, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 08:44, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 08:44, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 08:50, 14 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete- 100% unsourced in-universe fancruft. Reyk  YO!  09:08, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:54, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:54, 16 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep- Article in bad condition bad can be improved. Digimon franchise is notable. There are articles on list of characters of almost every important franchise including Pokemon.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 17:34, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
 *  Keep or Merge or Delete I thought about a merge to Digimon World but this series transcends 11 different video games. If someone wants to merge all the info into the different article's plot sections that I feel could be a good solution, if not then this should be kept and improved. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 20:40, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I also agree with a WP:TNT rationale here. No objectections here for a future re-creation with a better sourced list. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 02:26, 18 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Userfy (or make it a draft) so it can be worked on or delete per WP:LISTCRUFT and/or WP:FANCRUFT.  Ana  r  chyte   12:22, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Did you have someone in mind for userfying? It doesn't look like there's anyone who's regularly maintained it, or volunteering to clean it up... Sergecross73   msg me  13:02, 20 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:TNT, though I wouldn't be opposed of someone recreating it someday if they wrote it professionally with sources. That recreation should contain about 0% of what this article is though. Sergecross73   msg me  14:45, 17 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.