Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Digital Asset Management systems


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete as an article that consists of external links alone, WP:NOT refers. (aeropagitica) 04:56, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

List of Digital Asset Management systems

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Repository of mainly external links to commercial applications constituting spam Ref (chew) (do) 22:23, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOT Blueboy96 23:18, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete As a list of spam links. The article has had plenty of time to turn into more than just a list of links. OhNo itsJamie Talk 02:11, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep and if you like, get rid of the links that offend thee so greatly, keeping only the packages that have internal WP links to articles. Somebody help turn it into a comprehensive feature comparison table. Disclosure- I was one of the people that requested this page, and through these spam-like links I have now discovered a great many packages I hadn't previously heard of. Connectionfailure 07:34, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - (You admit it's spam-like?). Your suggestion would make a list of one valid article link in the ==Open Source== section, and two valid article links in the ==Commercial== section (one other in the latter section is a company article, not software product article, so is invalid). It's not much of a list to start with, otherwise I'd probably have tried to make it a correct article rather than sending it here. Ref (chew) (do)  19:32, 5 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletions.  -- Pax:Vobiscum 08:04, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Someguy1221 10:07, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.