Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Dinosaur Train characters


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Dinosaur Train. Star  Mississippi  15:14, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

List of Dinosaur Train characters

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

sourced only with primary sources that don't show notability Artem.G (talk) 18:06, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Artem.G (talk) 18:06, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Comics and animation,  and Lists.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:30, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
 * , per the relevant guideline, "Notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article". Your nomination, by contrast, focuses on only the state of the article. Given that the AfD guidelines provide a checklist of steps to carry out before nominating an article, what steps did you take to assess the notability of this particular topic before nominating the article for deletion? Moreover, given that you proposed deleting seven articles (1; 2; 3; 4; 5; 6; 7) with nearly identical rationales within the span of just 10 minutes (one of which has already been closed as a speedy keep), what pre-nomination steps could you have even taken in that time? --Usernameunique (talk) 08:11, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete all the information we need is on the parent article, not this massive article based entirely on primary sources. Dronebogus (talk) 14:49, 24 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Dinosaur Train - Fails WP:LISTN as no independent, reliable sources discuss this group with significant coverage.  // Timothy :: talk  10:54, 1 March 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.