Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Division I FBS independents football standings (1869–1905)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Primefac (talk) 21:21, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

List of Division I FBS independents football standings (1869–1905)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The list should be deleted as the college football independent records templates prior to 1956 are being reorganized by geographical region per discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football/Archive 22, Templates for discussion/Log/2020 January 23, and Templates for discussion/Log/2020 February 5. Jweiss11 (talk) 22:45, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages because for same reason provided above:

Jweiss11 (talk) 22:49, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:17, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:17, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:17, 13 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete. Per consensus at Wikipedia Talk:CFB. Ostealthy (talk) 13:08, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Commment. Could we just adapt these lists to incorporate the regional independents templates? Cbl62 (talk) 15:13, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I think it would easier to just start new list articles since they will be using a set of almost entirely new templates. We should discuss how we want to organize these at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football. Jweiss11 (talk) 18:21, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment there might be some value of storing these in the CFB project pages, but I see no reason for them to be in mainspace.--Paul McDonald (talk) 15:50, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Also, most of these templates were flawed in that, despite being created years ago, they included only a very small percentage of the college football independents' records. Accordingly, I see little or no value in storing them in a CFB project page. Cbl62 (talk) 16:19, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, xinbenlv  Talk, Remember to "ping" me 05:39, 21 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.