Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Dungeons & Dragons dwarf deities


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. As always, disregarding pure votes that make no argument by BOZ and "per BOZ".  Sandstein  21:15, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

List of Dungeons & Dragons dwarf deities

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is a containment list for extremely trivial characters, but the list itself is too trivial to exist. It fails to establish its own notability as a grouping, and these characters are not important enough to justify an article split. There is no worth upmerging this to another list. The topic of D&D deities is worth talking about in the main setting articles of the various D&D settings, but there is no current justification that a massive list of all deities is needed to understand the franchise. TTN (talk) 11:55, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 11:55, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 11:55, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fantasy-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 12:01, 23 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - per WP:GAMEGUIDE, Wikipedia is not a game guide. Not notable beyond that scope. -- Sirfurboy (talk) 12:16, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:39, 23 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep or selectively merge to Dwarf (Dungeons & Dragons). BOZ (talk) 13:03, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge as above. Perfectly legitimate merge target and merging should always be preferred over outright deletion. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:19, 23 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete- since this is sourced entirely to primary sources, it fails WP:LISTN. As for merging, the proposed target is already choc-a-bloc full of badly sourced fancruft and would only be worsened by including any more. Reyk YO! 13:49, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Like all of the other race-specific deity lists, none of the individual entries are notable, and there are no non-primary sources discussing them as a group that would allow them to pass WP:LISTN. Merging is not necessary for non-notable, non-reliably sourced material.  Rorshacma (talk) 16:25, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Pure gamecruft, fails WP:LISTN.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 18:05, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge per BOZ. Freeknowledgecreator (talk) 02:20, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete clearly fails WP:LISTN and WP:GAMEGUIDE. None of the sources are independent. SportingFlyer  T · C  11:55, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails NFICTION.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 20:34, 30 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.