Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Educational Institutions in Karaikal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Withdrawn. NAC. Joe Chill (talk) 19:34, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

List of Educational Institutions in Karaikal

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This article page should actually have been a category rather than a separate page. I propose we delete the page and have a category instead. ▒ Wirεłεşş ▒ Fidεłitұ ▒ Ćłâşş ▒ Θnε ▒ ―Œ  ♣Łεâvε Ξ мεşşâgε♣ 19:12, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:29, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:29, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  —• Gene93k (talk) 19:32, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. It's a valid list for educational institutions in the region and no reason it can not coexist with a category. Of the 49 items in the list, only #49 appears to be not notable for its own article, while I can't say for sure about #46 and #47. Everything else, can actually be articles per our notability guidelines, and having this list seems to be a very valid option now. - Spaceman  Spiff  20:10, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep: There is nothing wrong with this being a list. Joe Chill (talk) 19:04, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - lists and categories coexist. The way forward is to link each item, with the red links providing signposts for article development. TerriersFan (talk) 22:42, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: I do think that lists and categories can coexist and don't need to be mutually exclusive. I suggest this be considered my taking back my request for delete. I change my proposal to Keep ▒ Wirεłεşş ▒ Fidεłitұ ▒ Ćłâşş ▒ Θnε ▒ ―Œ  ♣Łεâvε Ξ мεşşâgε♣ 19:31, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.