Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of English dubbed anime


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete - Liberatore(T) 17:09, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

List of English dubbed anime
Superceded by Category:Anime dubbed into English so not needed or necessary. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjo e  01:07, 12 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions.   -- ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk  to Nihonjo e  01:09, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as nominator. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjo e  01:09, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per 穣. --Kunzite 01:12, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete redundant list. --Fire Star 火星 01:16, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Confusing Manifestation 01:18, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete There are other, more complete, lists like that. NN.  Heltec    talk 
 * Delete per nom. --Tetsuya-san (talk : contribs) 01:31, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Arbusto 02:35, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom. I  Lo  ve Plankton (T—C—U—L) 03:28, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, listcruft. --Ter e nce Ong 04:00, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Another pointless list, as the category already exists.   (aeropagitica)    (talk)   07:01, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Extremely Strong Keep If its good enough for a category its good enough for a list. As per Wikipedias own guidelines, categories most certainly do NOT supercede lists. Jcuk 08:24, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Jcuk. DarthVad e r 09:28, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete redundant per category. Plus potentially vast.  Adds nothing other than miantenance overhead. Just zis Guy you know? 11:11, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as mentioned, redundant. Voice of Treason 20:15, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment From Wikipedia's own Guidlines "lists are useful for Wikipedia development purposes. The lists of related topics give an indication of the state of the 'pedia, the articles that have been written, and the articles that have yet to be written. Like categories, lists can be used for keeping track of changes in the listed pages, using the Related Changes feature. Unlike a category, a list also allows detection of deletion of pages from it, and, more generally, a history of its contents is available."


 * Frankly, I cant see the point of Wikipedia if its own users dont give a damn about the guidelines they are supposed to operate under. You cant just make your own rules up as you go along, else Wikipedia becomes a laughing stock. Jcuk 20:40, 12 May 2006 (UTC)


 * This is different, though, since this list is growing exponentially with all of the anime being brought over. A category is much better suited to handle a list that's so large. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjo e  21:20, 12 May 2006 (UTC)


 * umm.. Categories have functioning "related changes" links. It's why they added the living people category to keep track of vandals. Perhaps the guidline is outdated?  Also... This list has very few redlinks.  Anime adapted into english has been very well covered on wikipedia so... it's not a useful red-link "to-do" list. --Kunzite 22:45, 12 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete Tell me why this page is useful? M1ss1ontomars2k4 23:15, 12 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep it's a list. Lists and catagories are not redundent to eachother. They serve diffrent purpases.  (looks like I'm in the minority here... oh well.) ---J.S (t|c) 00:00, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep List could be useful. - Nick C 13:45, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
 * keep please it is a useful list we can offer Yuckfoo 18:29, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete' as per reasons menioned above ShizuokaSensei 03:19, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect to the category page. Separate pages serve no purpose.--M @ r ē ino 16:07, 17 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.