Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Eurovision Song Contest 2014 jurors


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy Keep #1 - withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure)  Wes Mouse  &#10002;  03:51, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

List of Eurovision Song Contest 2014 jurors

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )
 * Also nominating List of Eurovision Song Contest 2015 jurors for the same reasons.  Wes Mouse  &#10002;  16:16, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Also nominating List of Eurovision Song Contest 2015 jurors for the same reasons.  Wes Mouse  &#10002;  16:16, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Content is a content fork of jury information that is already contained in each of the participating country articles for the Eurovision Song Contest 2014.  Wes Mouse  &#10002;  16:13, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:51, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:51, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:51, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:51, 7 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Your nomination reads more like a mere description of what it is than an objection: this list compiles information in one place that you'd otherwise have to look at 37 separate articles to find. That's one of the main purposes of having lists, isn't it? postdlf (talk) 15:15, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I hadn't looked at it in that way, so I suppose yes these may well and truly become useful after all. Nomination withdrawn. The articles perhaps could do with being structured properly so they are in compliance with manual of style?  Wes Mouse  &#10002;  03:42, 11 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.